![]() |
WORKING PAPER 07-4
Industrial Policy, Innovation Policy, and Japanese Competitiveness
by Marcus Noland, Peterson Institute for International Economics
May 2007
Japan—sometimes regarded as a model developmental state—faces significant challenges in encouraging innovation and entrepreneurship. The government’s selective industrial policy interventions have had little, if any, positive impact on productivity, growth, and welfare. Most resources have gone to large, politically influential "backward" sectors, suggesting that parochial politics determined these resource transfers. Rather than pursuing traditional industrial or science and technology policy, Japan should implement financial and labor-market reforms, which will spur innovative activity. As a group, Japan’s industrial firms are competitive relative to their foreign counterparts, but the country falls behind in the heavily regulated service sector. The problems seem due less to a lack of industrial policy than to an excess of regulation, particularly with respect to entry. If the government cannot pick winners, it could at least stop protecting losers. Japan may have more to gain through restructuring the lagging service sector than by expending resources on pursuing marginal gains in the industrial sector.
View full document [pdf]
RELATED LINKS
Op-ed: Will the Crisis Create a New Japan? March 16, 2011
Op-ed: Japan Must Dip into Its Rainy Day Fund March 24, 2011
Speech: Seven Broad Lessons for the United States from Japan’s Lost Decade March 26, 2009
Policy Brief 04-6: What Went Right in Japan November 2004
Working Paper 03-9: It Takes More than a Bubble to Become Japan October 2003