WORKING PAPER 07-4

Industrial Policy, Innovation Policy, and Japanese Competitiveness

by Marcus Noland, Peterson Institute for International Economics

May 2007

Marcus NolandJapan—sometimes regarded as a model developmental state—faces significant challenges in encouraging innovation and entrepreneurship. The government’s selective industrial policy interventions have had little, if any, positive impact on productivity, growth, and welfare. Most resources have gone to large, politically influential "backward" sectors, suggesting that parochial politics determined these resource transfers. Rather than pursuing traditional industrial or science and technology policy, Japan should implement financial and labor-market reforms, which will spur innovative activity. As a group, Japan’s industrial firms are competitive relative to their foreign counterparts, but the country falls behind in the heavily regulated service sector. The problems seem due less to a lack of industrial policy than to an excess of regulation, particularly with respect to entry. If the government cannot pick winners, it could at least stop protecting losers. Japan may have more to gain through restructuring the lagging service sector than by expending resources on pursuing marginal gains in the industrial sector.

View full document [pdf]


RELATED LINKS

Op-ed: Will the Crisis Create a New Japan? March 16, 2011

Op-ed: Japan Must Dip into Its Rainy Day Fund March 24, 2011

Speech: Seven Broad Lessons for the United States from Japan’s Lost Decade March 26, 2009

Policy Brief 04-6: What Went Right in Japan November 2004

Working Paper 03-9: It Takes More than a Bubble to Become Japan October 2003



© 2013 Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics. 1750 Massachusetts Avenue, NW.
Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 202-328-9000 Fax: 202-659-3225 / 202-328-5432
Site development and hosting by Digital Division