The Eurasian Growth Paradox

by Anders Aslund, Peterson Institute for International Economics
and Nazgul Jenish, University of Maryland

June 2006

Anders ÅslundIn the first decade of postcommunist transition, Central Europe took the lead, and analysts showed that vigorous economic growth followed from radical, comprehensive market reform. Since 2000, however, the transition countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) have grown 4 percentage points faster each year than the Central European countries. Reducing government spending was most effective in stimulating this growth, though the oil export boom was also a significant factor. The striking turnaround in growth rates can be traced to the Russian financial crash of August 1998, after which many CIS countries likewise experienced crises, which forced them to drastically reduce their budget deficits.

View full document [pdf]


Policy Brief 14-24: An Economic Strategy to Save Ukraine November 2014

Testimony: Ukraine: How It Can Combat Corruption November 19, 2014

Peterson Perspective: Ukraine's Turmoil Without End? December 3, 2013

Policy Brief 13-22: Ukraine's Choice: European Association Agreement or Eurasian Union? September 2013

Policy Brief 11-9: Lessons from the East European Financial Crisis, 2008-10 June 2011

Book: How Latvia Came through the Financial Crisis May 2011

Book: The Last Shall Be the First: The East European Financial Crisis October 2010

Paper: Proposals for Ukraine: 2010—Time For Reforms February 2010

Book: The Russia Balance Sheet April 2009

Book: How Ukraine Became a Market Economy and Democracy March 2009

Book: How Capitalism Was Built: The Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, and Central Asia August 2007

© 2016 Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics. 1750 Massachusetts Avenue, NW.
Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 202-328-9000 Fax: 202-659-3225 / 202-328-5432
Site development and hosting by Digital Division