WORKING PAPER 09-7

Criss-Crossing Globalization: Uphill Flows of Skill-Intensive Goods and Foreign Direct Investment

by Aaditya Mattoo, The World Bank
and Arvind Subramanian, Peterson Institute for International Economics

August 2009

The phenomenon of uphill flows of capital (from poorer to richer countries) has been heavily scrutinized in recent years. Much of the literature has focused on financial flows, with the assumption that finance is the only gravity-defying flow between countries. However, recent high-profile developments like Tata Motors' takeover of the United Kingdom's Jaguar and China's Lenovo acquiring IBM raise the possibility of uphill flows spreading to new dimensions. These developments run counter to standard trade model assumptions that developing countries primarily export unskilled labor-intensive products and receive foreign direct investment (FDI). The fact that skills, embodied in goods, services, or capital (in the form of entrepreneurial and managerial skills associated with FDI), are flowing from poorer to richer countries is making the phenomenon of uphill flows noteworthy from the trade perspective.

Mattoo and Subramanian show that the propensity of several developing countries, such as China, Mexico, and South Africa, to export sophisticated goods to rich trading partners has been increasing. Also, FDI flows to developed countries from developing countries like Brazil and India as a share of their GDP are as large as FDI flows from rich countries like Japan and the United States. The authors posit that it is not just the composition of exports but also their destination that matters. In both cross-sectional and panel regressions, with a range of controls, they find that a measure of uphill flows of sophisticated goods is significantly associated with better growth performance. While a large part of the benefits of trade has traditionally been seen as access to imports and inward FDI, there is a growing recognition that exporting and outward FDI may also confer important benefits. These results suggest the need for a deeper analysis of whether development benefits might derive not from deifying comparative advantage but from defying it.

View full document [pdf]


RELATED LINKS

Book: Foreign Direct Investment in the United States: Benefits, Suspicions, and Risks with Special Attention to FDI from China August 2013

Book: Outward Foreign Direct Investment and US Exports, Jobs, and R&D: Implications for US Policy August 2013

Policy Brief 13-1: The World Needs a Multilateral Investment Agreement January 2013

Working Paper 12-16: Transactions: A New Look at Services Sector Foreign Direct Investment in Asia October 2012

Working Paper 08-7: Policy Liberalization and FDI Growth, 1982 to 2006 August 2008

Op-ed: Avoiding Another Dubai February 28, 2006

Book: Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development? May 2005



© 2014 Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics. 1750 Massachusetts Avenue, NW.
Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 202-328-9000 Fax: 202-659-3225 / 202-328-5432
Site development and hosting by Digital Division