Peterson Institute publications
The Peterson Institute for International Economics is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan
research institution devoted to the study of international economic policy. More › ›
RSS News Feed Search

Policy Brief 09-7

US Taxation of Multinational Corporations: What Makes Sense, What Doesn’t

by Gary Clyde Hufbauer, Peterson Institute for International Economics
and Jisun Kim, Peterson Institute for International Economics

March 2009

View full document [pdf]


Gary Clyde Hufbauer
audio Listen to related interview
President Barack Obama proposes to translate his rhetoric directed against "tax breaks to corporations that ship jobs overseas" into new tax measures that will penalize investment abroad by US-based multinational corporations (MNCs). Hufbauer and Kim believe that the United States should not try to constrain the overseas operations of these firms. Instead, the United States should reform its enormously complex tax system at home and create a business-friendly environment. Tax reform should be designed to boost both the domestic and international activities of US-based MNCs and bring more foreign investment to American shores. To that end, tax reform should target fundamental issues rather than populist sound bites.

The United States maintains a complicated tax system with multiple loopholes but accompanied by high statutory corporate rates, at about 39 percent (federal plus state). Team Obama should simplify the corporate tax regime and lower the federal marginal (i.e., statutory) tax rate to 25 percent or less. The United States should also adopt a territorial approach to the taxation of "active income" earned by foreign operations of US-based MNCs. In other words, the United States should end any US taxation of active income earned by subsidiaries operating abroad. Shifting from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system would ensure that the United States remains an attractive location for MNC headquarters—since the active business income of foreign subsidiaries would no longer be subjected to a residual US corporate tax. The authors also recommend ways to deal with abuse of transfer pricing, and they support another tax holiday, at a 5.25 percent repatriation rate, both to gain revenue and to make it easier for corporations to raise cash in the midst of the financial crisis.


 

RELATED INTERVIEWS

Are High Corporate Taxes Shipping Jobs Overseas? May 6, 2009


RELATED LINKS

Policy Brief 11-16: US Tax Discrimination Against Large Corporations Should Be Discarded October 2011

Policy Brief 11-2: Corporate Tax Reform for a New Century April 2011

Policy Brief 10-10: Higher Taxes on Multinationals Would Hurt US Workers and Exports May 2010

Testimony: Tax Reform and the Tax Treatment of Debt and Equity July 13, 2011

Book: US Taxation of Foreign Income October 2007

Book: Reforming the US Corporate Tax September 2005

Op-ed: America Badly Needs a Value Added Tax April 21, 2005

Paper: Tax Policy in a Global Economy Revised February 2000