Keep up to date with Peterson Institute publications, events, and interviews via email, podcast, or RSS. More information on subscription options.
Working Paper 98-4
Tables
NAFTA Supplemental Agreements: Four Year Review
© Institute for International Economics. All rights reserved.
Table 1: CEC Article 14 Submissions on Enforcement Matters, January 1, 1994-May 1, 1998
|
|
|||||
|
I.D. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEM-97-001 | 4/2/97 | B.C. Aboriginal Fisheries Commission, et al. | Canada | Failure to enforce the Canadian Fisheries Act and to use its powers pursuant to the National Energy Board Act to ensure the protection of fish and fish habitat in B.C. rivers from ongoing and repeated environmental damage caused by hydro-electric dams. | Secretariat is reviewing the submission in light of the response from Canada. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEM-97-002 | 3/15/97 | Comite Pro Limpieza del Rio Magdalena | Mexico | Failure to enforce Mexican environmental laws governing disposal of wastewater. Alleging that wastewater from Imuris, Magdalena de Kino, and Santa Ana is being discharged into the Magdalena River without prior treatment. | Secretariat is reviewing submission. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEM-97-003 | 4/9/97 | Centre quebecois du droit de l'environnement, et al. | Canada | Failure to enforce several environmental protection standards regarding agriculture pollution originating from animal production facilities in Quebec. | Secretariat is reviewing the submission in light of the response from Canada. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEM-97-004 | 5/26/97 | Canadian Environmental Defence Fund | Canada | Failure to enforce law requiring environmental assessment of federal initiatives, policies and programs. In particular, failure to conduct an environmental assessment of the Atlantic Groundfish Strategy, as required by Canadian Law, jeoporadizing the future of Canada's east coast fisheries. | Secretariat determined that submission criteria was not met. Lack of evidence that the Party is failing to effectively enforce its environmental law. Specifically, there was a significant delay between the time of the alleged failure to enforce and the filing of the submission, and there was no indication that the Party's failure was continuing. Moreover, the law had been superseded and is no longer in force, and nothing indicates that local remedies were diligently pursued. Process terminated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEM-97-005 | 7/21/97 | Animal Alliance of Canada, et al. | Canada | Failure to pass endangered species legislation or regulations as required by the Biodiversity Convention to which Canada is a signatory. | Secretariat is reviewing submission. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEM-95-001 | 6/30/95 | Biodiversity Legal Foundation, et al. | USA | Failure to effectively enforce some provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 due to enactment of the Rescissions Act of 1995. | Process terminated. Determined that "enactment of legislation which specifically alters the operation of pre-existing environmental law in essence becomes a part of the greater body of laws and statutes on the books. "The Sectretariat" cannot characterize the application of a new legal regime as a failure to enforce an old one." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEM-95-002 | 8/30/95 | Sierra Club, et al. | USA | Failure to effectively enforce all applicable Federal environmental laws by eliminating private remedies for salvage timber sales due to "Logging Rider" clause of the Rescissions Act of 1995. | Process terminated for the same reason as stated in submission SEM-95-001. The Secretariat also concluded that the submission lacked a factual basis supporting the assertion of failure to effectively enforce. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEM-96-001 | 1/18/96 | Comite para la Proteccion de los Recursos Naturales, et al. | Mexico | Failure to effectively enforce environmental laws during the evaluation process of a project involving construction and operation of a port terminal and related works in Cozumel. | Factual record released Oct. 24, 1997. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEM-96-002 | 3/20/96 | Aage Tottrup, P. Eng | Canada | Failure to effectively enforce environmental laws resulting in the pollution of specified wetland areas impacting on the habitat of fish and migratory birds. | Process terminated because submission currently pending before Canadian Court of Law. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEM-96-003 SEM-97-006 |
9/9/96 10/4/97 |
The Friends of the Old Man River | Canada | Failure to effectively enforce the habitat protection sections of the Fisheries Act and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. | Process terminated because a similar legal issue is currently pending before Canadian Court of Law. The submission was re-filed (as SEM-97-006) on October 4, 1997, following conclusion of Canadian legal proceedings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEM-96-004 | 11/14/96 | The Southwest Center for Biological Diversity and Dr. Robin Silver | USA | Failure to effectively enforce the National Policy Act with respect to the U.S. Army's operation at Fort Huachuca. Specifically, expansion of the base will drain local water supply and destroy the ecosystem dependent on it. | Submission withdrawn. Matter is currently being examined by the Secretariat under Article 13. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEM-97-007 | 10/10/97 | Instituto de Derecho Ambiental | Mexico | Failure to effectively enforce the applicable environmental laws with respect to a citizens' complaint filed on 23 September 1996 in regard to the Hydrological Basin of the Lerma Santiago River-Lake Chapala. The citizen's complaint was submitted "with the view to declaring a state of environmental emergency in the Lake Chapala ecosystem, following administrative proceedings." Specifically, the submitters allege failure to carry out the formalities the case required and the administrative procedures provided by the LGEEPA. | Secretariat is reviewing submission. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEM-98-002 | 10/14/97 | Hector Gregorio Ortiz Martinez | Mexico | Failure to effectively enforce the applicable environmental legislation in relation to a citizen's complaint regarding lumbering operations at the "El Taray" site in the state of Jalisco. Specifically, the submitter alleges that the technical audit and inspection visit which were performed was an inadequate response to the citizen submission and that the relevant authority failed to issue the appropriate ruling regarding damages and losses as provided by section 194 of the LGEEPA that was in force at the time of the submission. | Secretariat is reviewing submission. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEM-98-001 | 1/9/98 | Instituto de Derecho Ambiental | Mexico | Failure of the Federal Attorny General and Federal Judiciary to effectively enforce the LGEEPA in relation to the April 22, 1992 explosions in the Reforma area of the city of Guadalajara, state of Jalisco. | Secretariat is reviewing submission. |
|
|
|||||
Source: Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 1998. Submissions on Enforcement Matters. http://www.cec.org/English/citizen/index.cfm?format=1 ( May 8).
Table 2. BECC Certified Projects and BECC/NADBank Participation, January 1, 1994-April 22, 1998
|
|
|||
| Location | Project | Certified | BECC/NADBank Participation |
|
|
|
|
|
| Brawley, California, USA | Water Treatment Plant (US$24.8 million) | 9/28/95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico | Wastewater Treatment Plant (US$8.2 million) | 9/28/95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| El Paso, Texas, USA | Wastewater Reuse Project (US$11.7 million) | 11/15/95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nogales, Sonora, Mexico | Water Supply and Distribution Project (US$39 million) | 1/18/96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Matamoros, Tamaulipas, Mexico | Wastewater Treatment Plant for the FINSA Industrial Park (US$1.1 million) | 1/18/96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Naco, Sonora, Mexico | Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment Project (US$1.02 million) | 4/30/96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| El Paso, Texas, USA | On-Site Self-Help Wastewater Treatment System Project (i.e. Project to provide no-interest loans to help 180 colonia families properly install septic tanks and treat household sewage.) (US$155,000) | 7/18/96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Somerton, Arizona, USA | Wastewater Treatment Project (US$2.7 million) | 11/9/96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico | Sanitary Landfill Project (US$2.0 million) | 11/9/96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mercedes, Texas, USA | Water Supply and Sewage Collection Project (US$4.1 million) | 11/9/96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Puerto Penasco, Sonora, Mexico | Sanitary Landfill Project (US$2.2 million) | 11/9/96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Douglas, Arizona, USA | Upgrade of Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities (US$2.0 million) | 1/18/97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico | Parallel Conveyance System and Rehabilitation of the San Antonio de los Buenos Plant (US$18.2million) | 6/18/97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alton, Texas, USA | Wastewater Treatment System (US$14.8 million) | 6/18/97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| San Diego, California, USA | Expansion of South Bay Reclamation Plant (US$99.3 million) | 6/18/97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico | Ecoparque (i.e. project set up to treat wastewater to secondary standards for reuse as irrigation to green areas.) (US$177,000) | 6/18/97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cuidad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico | Wastewater Treatment Plants and Supplemental Wastewater Collection Projects (US$31.2 million) | 9/30/97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico | New River Sanitation Program (US$50.4 million) | 1/7/98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| El Paso, Texas, USA | Jonathan Rogers Water Treatment Plant Expansion (US$37.8 million) | 1/7/98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Del Rio, Texas, USA | Water Treatment Plant and Improvements (US$40.3 million) |
3/31/98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico | Sanitation System (US$80 million) | 3/31/98 |
|
|
|
|||
Source: NADBank, NADBank News, Vol. II, Issue No. 9, April 22, 1998; Certification dates are from the BECC, Project Certification. http:cocef.interjuarez.com/ing53.htm.
Table 3. U.S. NAO Submissions on Enforcement Matters, January 1, 1994-April 10, 1998
|
|
|||||
| Submission | Filed | Claimant | Defendant | Claim | Status |
| 940001 and 940002 | 2/14/94 | International Brotherhood of Teamsters and United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, respectively | Honeywell Corporation and General Electric Coorporation in Mexico | Workers deprived of their freedom of association and the right to organize into unions of their our choice. | Process terminated at NAO review stage due to insufficient evidence. U.S. NAO recommended the development of trilateral programs addressing freedom of association and the right to organize and for public information and education regarding the NAALC. |
| 940003 | 8/16/94 | International Labor Rights Education and Research Fund Corporation, the National Association of Democratic Lawyers of Mexico, the Coalition for Justice in the Maquiladoras, and the American Friends Service Committee. | Sony Corporation in Mexico | Workers deprived of their freedom of association and the right to organize and minimum employment standards relating to hours of work and holiday work. | Ministerial consultations held. Resulted in a two year program of activities including seminars, workshops, meetings and studies to address union registration and its implications. The U.S. NAO issued a report in December 1996 based on a follow-up review of the issues and a related Mexican Supreme Court decision. (Allegations concerning minimum employment standards were not accepted for review because appropriate measures had not been taken under the laws of Mexico.) |
|
|
|||||
| 940004 | 9/12/94 | United Electrical, Radio, & Machine Workers | General Electric Corporation in Mexico | Workers deprived of their freedom of association and the right to organize. | Withdrawn before completion of review process. |
|
|
|||||
| 9601 | 6/13/96 | International Labor Rights Fund, Human Rights Watch/Americas and the National Association of Democratic Lawyers of Mexico. | Mexican Government | Federal workers denied freedom of association and the right to organize resulting from, among other reasons, Mexican government failure to comply with international labor organization conventions to which it is a signatory. Also, questioned whether labor tribunals reviewing these issues are impartial. | Ministerial consultations held on the status of international treaties, constitutional provisions and protecting freedom of association. Resulted in NAFTA members agreeing to exchange information to permit a full examination of the issues raised. A seminar, open to the public, was held in Baltimore on December 4, 1997 regarding these issues. The allegation of imparitality of labor tribunals for the federal sector were found to be ungrounded. The NAO is currently considering a request by the submitters on December 3, 1997 to reopen the submission on grounds that some of the issues raised in the original submission were not adequately addressed. |
|
|
|||||
| 9602 | 10/11/96 | Communications Workers of America, Union of Telephone Workers of Mexico, and Federation of Unions in Goods and Services Companies of Mexico. | Maxi-Switch in Mexico | Workers denied freedom of association and the right to organize. | Submitters withdrew the submission after the federal government instructed the local authorities to certify the independent union. The local authorities have not complied and the dispute has been taken to the Mexican courts. |
|
|
|||||
| 9701 | 5/16/97 | Human Rights Watch, the International Labor Rights Fund, and the National Association of Democratic Lawyers of Mexico. | Mexican Government | Failure to enforce Mexican labor law prohibitions on discrimination against pregnant women. Also, allege that Mexico denies victims of sex discrimination access to impartial tribunals. | In January 1998, the U.S. NAO requested ministerial consultations on the effectiveness of Mexican laws and law enforcement in protecting against pregnancy-based gender discrimination. |
|
|
|||||
| 9702 | 10/30/97 | Support Committee for Maquiladora Workers (SCMW),the International labor Rights Fund, the National Association of Democratic Lawyers of Mexico, and the Union of Metal, Steel, Iron, and Allied Workers Union of Mexico. | Han Young factory in Mexico and Mexican Government | Workers denied freedom of association and the right to organize. Also, raises issues of failure by Mexico to enforce its laws on safety and health, wages, dismissal from employment, and profit sharing. | Mexican government recognized the results of a second election (secret ballot election held on December 12, 1997) which was won by the independent union. However, Han Young has subsequently refused to negotiate with the new union and the responsible labor tribunal has permited another election at the plant to challenge the representation by the independent union. The Mexican government levied a US$9,000 fine against Han Young for health and safety violation. |
|
|
|||||
| 9703 | 12/15/97 | Echlin Workers Alliance, the Teamsters, the Canadian Auto Workers, UNITE, the United Elecrical, radio and Machine Workers of America, the Paperworkers, and the Steelworkers, et al. | ITAPSA export processing plant in Mexico | Workers denied freedom of association and the right to organize. | The U.S. NAO is currently reviewing the submission. |
|
|
|||||
Source: NAO, U.S. Department of Labor, "Status of Submissions Under the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC)", April 10, 1998; Various Public Report of Reviews by the U.S. NAO, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor, and by the Mexican NAO, Secretariat of Labor and Social Welfare.
Table 4. Mexican NAO Submissions on Enforcement Matters, January 1, 1994-April 10, 1998
|
|
|||||
| Submission | Filed | Claimant | Defendant | Claim | Status |
|
|
|||||
| 9501 | 2/9/95 | Mexican Telephone Workers Union | Sprint Corporation in U.S. | Workers deprived of their freedom of association and the right to organize due to closure of Sprint subsidiary in San Francisco shortly before a union representation election. | Ministerial Consultations held. Resulted in: 1. a public forum held in San Francisco. 2. initiation of Secretariat special study on "Plant Closings and Labor Rights" The Communications Workers of America filed an unfair labor practice case with the National Labor Review Board (NLRB). On Dec. 27, 1996, the NLRB ordered Sprint to reinstate the dismissed workers and awarded backpay. Sprint filed an appeal with the U.S. federal courts. In November 1997, the US federal courts reversed the NLRB ruling and ruled that Sprint closed its plant because the it was losing money, not because the company feared the workers would vote to join a union. |
|
|
|||||
Source: NAO, U.S. Department of Labor, "Status of Submissions Under the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC)", April 10, 1998; Report on Review of Public Submission: NAO Submission #9501, NAO, Secretariat of Labor and Social Welfare, Mexico, Federal District, May 31, 1995.